The SC has involved itself in matters of moderation since its inception, but has repeatedly failed to understand the issues in the community and the requirements of moderation.
I imagine it would be easier for the SC to understand your perspectives on moderation if you actually documented any part of your process.
This is the official NixOS moderation log: moderation/moderation-log.md at 940106d7d66f9ea34e1e37eed74d54459bffc865 · NixOS/moderation · GitHub
Observe all the things missing that would help the SC educate themselves about what it is that the moderation team does:
- what the person said that led to the moderation action (i.e. a quotation)
- who they said it to
- where they said it (e.g. Matrix, discourse, GitHub)
- when they said
- which moderator made the ultimate call
- how many moderators agree or disagree with the moderation decision
- which section of the Code of Conduct was violated
Documenting these things would constitute something called “accountability”. But you dodge accountability at every opportunity. Why?