I am attempting to get an environment up and running so I can develop against elm 0.19.0 which is on the unstable channel. I will also need some dependencies from the stable channel - is it possible to have both?
I see one way of using the unstable channel here. Is this good nix style ?
I have not found need to import a particular git revision, but that is one alternative. I usually reference nixpkgs paths defined in NIX_PATH: import <unstable> {} or something.
Is there a reason that either of these would not work? Could you take a package straight out of a nixpkgs channel, packages having dependencies from different nixpkgs versions, or do you need a package from unstable with its dependencies changed to the stable versions, for example?
You can import additional channels as local variables e.g. with:
let
unstable = import (fetchTarball https://nixos.org/channels/nixos-unstable/nixexprs.tar.xz) { };
in
{ nixpkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {} }:
with nixpkgs; mkShell {
buildInputs = [ hello unstable.elmPackages.elm ];
}
This also shows how to get the ‘standard’ tarball. Alternativly you can add channels with nixos-channels or to NIX_PATH. I.e if you’ve added a channel called nixos-unstable you can write in the expr. above (as @atanasi has hinted at)
unstable = <nixos-unstable> {};
Do you need dependencies from stable, build against unstable, or the other way around? I’d have to look that up, but let me know so I can add that later.
Given https://nixos.org/channels/nixos-unstable is now deprecated, what is the current best practice for using a package from unstable within a shell.nix file?
https://nixos.org/channels/<channel-name> still works, but you can also use https://channels.nixos.org/<channel-name> if you want to avoid one level of redirection.
Thanks. It was weird in that using https://nixos.org/channels/nixos-unstable gave me an older version of ziglang than stable. I’ll try the https://channels.nixos.org/<channel-name> approach and see what happens.