That’s a relief.
I actually agree. But what if the authoritarian leadership takes on a radical opinion that willfully excludes productive members of the community? Do we just stand by and watch as they justify everything under the paradox of tolerance? What about the paradox of the oppressed? What the hell is so offensive about steak anyway, cause I’m still not getting it.
It is one thing if there is an authoritarian BDFL who is actually primarily concerned with the health of the community and the project, but what if the leadership puts personal political motivations above the good of the community? We can’t even point it out or dare to disagree without risking a ban? Seems destructive and wasteful to me.