I’m sure, even if anduril isn’t one such organization for you, e.g. taking money from Hamas or the wagner group would be a place where we all would agree that “discrimination” would be fine.
Yea, there are sanctions against doing business with organizations listed as “terrorist organizations”, I agree. But even then, different parts of the world will have different lists of “terrorist organizations”. In this case, I believe the foundation had some notes stating to “adhere to local laws” for conventions. Not sure the stance globally.
Also, discrimination is defined as follows: …
There’s many definitions definition:
the act of making or perceiving a difference: the act of discriminating
“discrimination between right and wrong”
Also, in computer science, discrimination is a term which can be applied on determining a total ordering of values, achieving linear sorting behavior.
Sure in most common usage, it means what you described. But not what I intended.
Not the direction I was going in at all.
the NixOS Foundation is obligated to
discriminate againstfilter out undesirable potential sponsors
Is that wording more palatable? Regardless, it’s orthogonal to the point I was trying to make; and not productive in the discussion.
I would like to move the conversation to Should organizations relating to the defense sector being able to sponsor NixOS?