# Nixpkgs package badges

**URL:** https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixpkgs-package-badges/29056
**Category:** Uncategorized
**Created:** [June 12, 2023, 8:16pm UTC](https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixpkgs-package-badges/29056 "2023-06-12T20:16:22Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 22

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![iFreilicht](https://discourse.nixos.org/user_avatar/discourse.nixos.org/ifreilicht/32/9702_2.png) [@iFreilicht](https://discourse.nixos.org/u/iFreilicht)
#### Post date: [June 15, 2023, 7:12am UTC](https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixpkgs-package-badges/29056/22 "2023-06-15T07:12:01Z")

</div>

I agree, this feels like it will be a longer discussion. I created a new topic for it:

> [@Should nix flakes become the default installation method for packages?](https://discourse.nixos.org/t/should-nix-flakes-become-the-default-installation-method-for-packages/29127):
>
> Following up on the discussion from [https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixpkgs-package-badges/29056/](https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixpkgs-package-badges/29056/) as I think this is an interesting topic that would derail the topic there. (To define the scope a little, I’m only talking about the vision for the future here, I know that flakes are not going to be stabilized for some time still and won’t become any sort of default before that) I see what you mean. If you use flakes inside other flakes, this is resolved by .follows, but when installing on the com…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixpkgs-package-badges/29056)._