btw, big thumbs up for condorcet ranking!
2 Likes
I like what @fpletz is suggesting here for both process and nix cache long term management.
1 Like
6 Likes
It seems like MJ3 (which is good old combined approval voting?) is a good compromise between simplicity and expressiveness. MJ5 is also good, and anything beyond would make voting a rather annoying process.
I’m no election system expert, but I get that people can really geek out on this! CIVS was a solid choice here because it’s ideal for electing a group with broad support:
- Comparison vs. Grading: CIVS does head-to-head comparisons, showing preferences between candidates, while MJ3 uses overall grades, which is simpler but best for single-winner elections.
- Median vs. Pairwise: MJ3 finds a median consensus for each candidate, but CIVS uses pairwise support across matchups, which shines in group elections.
It’s unfortunate some found it confusing, but CIVS really fits this committee setup!
2 Likes
Thank you to the SC and Sil, I know it was not fun.
8 Likes
Now that the election is over, I think its a good idea for this to be unpinned, and Community Team Updates be pinned instead.
5 Likes