Well, because A.
But why is A a bad thing?
Because A will lead to B.
But why is B a bad thing?
Because B is a type of C.
But why is C a bad thing?
…Why… how could… I mean, C is just something I think most people really dislike?
A-ha! Mayyyyyybe this is just a thing you dislike but nothing is actually wrong!
Please convince me that this is not the argument you’re trying to have by clarifying what sort of reason would satisfy your questioning, because it seems to me that the comments I link do give reasons that just don’t satisfy you.
(Also, the topic of this thread is the defense sector, not Anduril specifically, so posters here are naturally going to avoid the subject of what specifically is their problem with Anduril if they want to stay on topic.)
Edited to add: Here are five more comments, this time selected from the first 20 in this thread, containing well-articulated explanations for why those commenters oppose defense sector sponsorships.
- Should organizations relating to the defense sector being able to sponsor NixOS? - #5 by shanesveller
- Should organizations relating to the defense sector being able to sponsor NixOS? - #6 by jakehamilton
- Should organizations relating to the defense sector being able to sponsor NixOS? - #12 by jkxyz
- Should organizations relating to the defense sector being able to sponsor NixOS? - #15 by pyrox
- Should organizations relating to the defense sector being able to sponsor NixOS? - #17 by schmittlauch
Read up! I’m not going to do any more of these round-ups. If these five don’t satisfy you either, read the remainder of the thread yourself; I’m sure you’ll find more, and read the other threads if you want even more than that.