2023-04-03 Meeting #2
We’re still looking for more shepherds, if you’re interested, please nominate yourself!
Present: @infinisil (author), @lheckemann (lead shepherd)
-
Authorship vs Reviewership
- @infinisil: For RFC 140 we had a problem where we had a team of 5 people listed as author, which disallows any of them to be part of the shepherd team
- @infinisil: Similarly for RFC 101, where the shepherd team essentially took over the RFC
- @lheckemann: replying to the comment
-
@infinisil: So this isn’t a problem for RFC 138, but the RFC process should address this at some point
- @lheckemann: Might not need to be changed, maybe just add an interpretation note
-
@infinisil: How to proceed? Still no extra shepherd
- Could pause the RFC until shepherd is found
- Let’s continue meeting for now
-
@lheckemann: Not sure this RFC is a good idea. Makes creating an RFC seem like a bigger deal
- @infinisil: Probably insignificant extra effort compared to writing the RFC text
- @infinisil: We should have a RFC repository template for nice GitHub integration