Configuring zsh on MacOS

I’m just getting started using Nix on MacOS, and am wondering about the best way to integrate with the zsh shell. I’m using nix-env to install packages, I’m not currently trying or intending to manage any of the Mac’s configuration using nix-adjacent tools (Home Manager, nix-darwin).

The things I’d like to do are:

  • have zsh pick up on completions installed as part of packages installed with nix-env.
  • be able to install a zsh “config”, in particular grml-zsh-config, with nix-env and use that.

I don’t have a strong opinion on whether I use the system zsh or nixpkgs.zsh.

I’ve done some searching, but I haven’t found any really clear suggestions on the best way to connect things up.

As far as I can tell, both the system zsh and the nix zsh read the MacOS zsh configuration at /etc/zshrc, as well as the other usual configuration files (~/.zshenv, /etc/zprofile - which confusingly mangles paths on MacOS, ~/.zprofile, ~/.zshrc).

Both system zsh and nix zsh add their respective /usr/share/zsh/x.y.z/functions directories to the $fpath meaning that the appropriate “built-in” completion functions are available to zsh. Neither system zsh nor nix zsh add nix’s site-functions directory (~/.nix-profile/share/zsh/site-functions) to the $fpath, meaning that completions for installed packages are not availble.

The cleanest solution I’ve come up with so far is to manually add the appropriate site-packages to the $fpath in ~/.zshrc and also source the grml-zsh-config here. I figure that the site-functions path should be stable, and that grml-zsh-config upgrades should “just work”. My ~/.zshrc minus some unrelated path additions:

export fpath=(/Users/jony/.nix-profile/share/zsh/site-functions $fpath)
source  $(nix-env -q --out-path grml-zsh-config | cut -d' ' -f3)/etc/zsh/zshrc

That seems to work, and seems reasonably clean … but I can’t help but wondering whether I’m doing it all wrong, since I don’t see anyone mentioning this sort of thing anywhere. Any thoughts from more experienced nix users?

Thanks,

Jony

I don’t see anyone mentioning this sort of thing anywhere

I think those two are related!

Are you doing so to try to reduce the number of moving parts?
I was a nix novice and went straight into a full nix-darwin + home-manager (pre-flakes) without major issues.
That might end up being the simpler/easier path because it’s more common, so you’ll find more sample configurations!

Haha, fair point :slight_smile:

I guess maybe a question sparked by this is: should nix-daemon.sh also adjust the $fpath ? Then completions would “just work” for people who only install nix to use nix-env.