First of all I want to give a small hint, when using flakes your channel related commands might not be doing what you expect them to do, aka they do no longer influence your system config.
You might want to set up your NIX_PATH to use the nixpks input of your flake, so that stable nix commands use the same nixpks revs like the unstable (flake) ones. In a āflake worldā the inputs āreplaceā the channels (or in other words flake donāt use the channels)
About your issues:
When taking a careful look at your flake inputs, one will notice that there is no branch mentioned for the home manager input. That will result in picking the default one which is master and that matches up to nixos-unstable.
As your nixpks input is nixos-24.11 (so stable), that is the source of the error message.
As for your channels you tried to pick stable home manager, your should update the home manager input to
This is a problem people have been running into for years that hasnāt been addressed in community communication and documentation, not sure why.
The version mismatch is merely a symptom of that: Including Home Manager from Nixpkgs is upside-down, IMHO, because Home Manager is already building on top of some version of Nixpkgs (there are tests and appropriate release branches etc.). So at least for regular Linux distributions, instead Iād recommend picking the exact Nixpkgs a given Home Manager release uses, and generally thinking of Home Mananager as a standalone application that uses Nixpkgs and Nix underneath, not some nice add-on to Nix or Nixpkgs.
(Practically this means using follows in flakes; stable Nix is currently hosed because thereās no backward compatible interface upstream and one has to do atrocious things such as reading flake.lock.)
This gets slightly more complicated with NixOS, because NixOS is definitely a standalone application on top of Nixpkgs. It so happens that Nixpkgs and NixOS live in the same source tree, such that in practice you can build your NixOS from the Nixpkgs that ships with Home Manager, but that sounds and feels wrong to me. This is why I prefer to keep the two entirely separate.
In both cases youāre left with trusting Home Manager maintainers to stay close to Nixpkgs release branch tips for security patches to reach you timely, or, as you do now, keep Nixpkgs references up to date yourself and absorb the maintenance burden of ensuring compatibility.
Thank you. I am still very new to NixOS and read about the use of channels in the manual to keep my system up to date but did not realize that what channel I am following isnāt relevant when using flakes.
Apologies but Iām not sure I follow what you are suggesting here. Can you please elaborate? Currently, I have:
Thank you. Your suggestion to use home-manager.url = "github:nix-community/home-manager/release-24.11" indeed addressed the warning.
Alternatively, it looks like if I want to use the unstable or master branch, I would have to use the following URLs in my /etc/nixos/flake.nix to keep things consistent:
Thanks for your response. Even though I have been using Ubuntu for around a decade, I am have only been experimenting with NixOS for a week or so in a virtual machine so Iām still trying to learn what the best approach to set up my system is:
Do I even need to use Home Manager?
If so, do I set it up standalone or as a NixOS module?
Do I install it via flakes?
I know there are advantages and disadvantages to all of these approaches but I just need to better understand them.
Iād recommend to always mention the branch you want to use in the urls of the flake inputs, otherwise you might have just implicit selected what you want to download, and it might change if the default branch changes.
Aside that in most of the times you never want to use nixpks/master as input (which would be the case in nixpkgs.url = "github:nixos/nixpkgs";).
But aside that you are correct.
Apologies but Iām not sure I follow what you are suggesting here. Can you please elaborate?
Tho that is not the deal breaker (I just found it important for my personal setup) and as you pointed you that you are new to nixos Iād recommend to leave it on the defaults (and maybe you didnāt even need to care about that at all).
If you trust that the default branch will never change (which will possibly true but who knows ) both are effectivly the same.
Tho you should switch from nixpkgs-unstable to nixos-unstable as the nixpkgs-unstable is not running all tests that are kind of relevant for nixos, so you might end up in a situation, that the binary cache will miss (a lot/some) programs,
AFAIK nixpkgs-unstable is often used by users that have non-nixos setups (e.G nix-darwin or just nix on another linux distro). But even then using nixos-unstable as source should not hurt (it will likely just be a bit behind nixpkgs-unstable).