As I have pointed out in a quick comment on the @Infinisil PR about some quirks of the new by-name hierarchy, I have a question:
-
How should we deal with libsForQt5.callPackage
and friends?
Currently I am getting rid of it, by putting libsForQt5
as an explicit dependency of the package.
-
How should we deal with darwin.apple_sdk_XYZ.callPackage
and friends?
It looks way harder to me since I don’t deal with Apple quirks.
Like 1, use darwin.apple_sdk.foo
directly.
This is a bit useless, since some softwares like, say, tinycc
, have no explicit dependencies on Apple-isms.
Thank you for nothing. I will search a little more.