vroad
June 5, 2022, 8:10am
1
I could still use the font from older nixpkgs though I’m wondering what happend to font weight on NixOS 22.05. Font rendering on Google Chrome look fine, the problem is just with KDE UI fonts (and only with Japanese font rendering, font rendering of Latin alphabet look same on both versions).
NixOS 22.05
NixOS 21.11
1 Like
Maybe related to the switch to variable font . It has been reverted but at present the revert has not gotten to channels yet .
3 Likes
vroad
December 11, 2022, 4:52am
3
@jtojnar
I have been able to use KDE without issues after the fix, however, the same problem have reappeared after upgrading to NixOS 22.11.
NixOS:release-22.05
← midchildan:fix/noto-cjk-2205
opened 03:21PM - 26 May 22 UTC
###### Description of changes
Fixes #171976. Some non-free packages happend to … include the problematic version of Harfbuzz that made the variable Noto CJK not render properly.
<!--
For package updates please link to a changelog or describe changes, this helps your fellow maintainers discover breaking updates.
For new packages please briefly describe the package or provide a link to its homepage.
-->
###### Things done
- Built on platform(s)
- [X] x86_64-linux
- [ ] aarch64-linux
- [X] x86_64-darwin
- [ ] aarch64-darwin
- [ ] For non-Linux: Is `sandbox = true` set in `nix.conf`? (See [Nix manual](https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/command-ref/conf-file.html))
- [ ] Tested, as applicable:
- [NixOS test(s)](https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/index.html#sec-nixos-tests) (look inside [nixos/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/tests))
- and/or [package tests](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#sec-package-tests)
- or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in [lib/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/lib/tests) or [pkgs/test](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/test)
- made sure NixOS tests are [linked](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#ssec-nixos-tests-linking) to the relevant packages
- [ ] Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using `nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"`. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see [nixpkgs-review usage](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review#usage)
- [ ] Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in `./result/bin/`)
- [22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#generating-2205-release-notes)
- [ ] (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
- [ ] (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
- [ ] (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
- [ ] (Release notes changes) Ran `nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh` to update generated release notes
- [X] Fits [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
<!--
To help with the large amounts of pull requests, we would appreciate your
reviews of other pull requests, especially simple package updates. Just leave a
comment describing what you have tested in the relevant package/service.
Reviewing helps to reduce the average time-to-merge for everyone.
Thanks a lot if you do!
List of open PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls
Reviewing guidelines: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#chap-reviewing-contributions
-->
This bug seems to have reappearred. I’m currently on Nix unstable and here is a screenshot from Kate settings.