PRs ready for review _

Development
6837

Quality of life change: adding a simple debug flag to step-ca (certificate/pki server)

6838
6839
6840
6841
6842

I’d like for this to be reviewed: fetchFromForgejo: implement as first-class fetcher by BastianAsmussen · Pull Request #513072 · NixOS/nixpkgs · GitHub

Thank you for your time. :slight_smile:

6843

Would love to get this PR merged: nixos-containers: allow hard-coding container veth MAC address & add IPv6 SLAAC test case by lschuermann · Pull Request #462775 · NixOS/nixpkgs · GitHub

It’s been sitting there for a good half-year, and I don’t know how to attract more reviewers or get this over the finish line. Been using it in production on my cluster for some time now. :slight_smile:

1 Like
6844

This is my PR, adding Retrom as a package. I authored the flake for this in the upstream repo, and have been using it for a few weeks. I think that’s valid testament to them being stable enough. Would appreciate if anyone can give it a review.

6845

A reviewer (acid-bong) reviewed the build phase, but said “can’t review build and install phases tho, as I’m not familiar with fcitx5, so I’ll leave it to those with more experience”. Does anyone with knowledge about fcitx5 want to review this?

6846

New package. All checks passed!

6847

Updated ly, would like to have some feedback on the dependency packaging for zig 0.16.

6848

Getting ahead of ZHF… this adds a simple upstream patch for a build failure in sphinxcontrib-bibtex. No maintainer I am afraid.

6849
6850
6851
6852

This should ideally be merged before the next release, as the current behavior will break existing scripts that interact with Bluetooth devices via bluetoothctl.

(mb already had it posted in a diff channel. it already got 2 reviews)

6853
6854
6855
6856