General business
Present in the meeting: @asymmetric @infinisil @getpsyched @kevincox @mat
-
Address Community Team Updates
- See post.
Unlabelled and New RFCs
- RFC 184: versioned flakes references
- @asymmetric: should we add
status: new
label? what’s the diff withstatus: open-for-nominations
?- @kevincox: the
new
label is old and currently unused
- @kevincox: the
- @asymmetric: labels not clearly associated with RFC state diagram, some better docs would be good
- labeled as
status: open-for-nominations
- this should be automated
- @asymmetric: should we add
RFCs Open for Nominations
- RFC 139: Declarative filesystem layouts
-
Commented that it would be closed if no interest a month ago
-
Barely any activity
-
we’ll close it and post the below message:
RFCSC: This RFC is being closed due to lack interest. If enough shepherds are found this issue can be reopened. If you don’t have permission to reopen please open an issue for the NixOS RFC Steering Committee linking to this PR.
-
RFCs in Discussion
- RFC 148: Pipe operator
- Updated on 2024-11-16
- @asymmetric: in an experimentation phase, leave as is
- RFC 163: Portable Service Layer
- Updated on 2024-11-11
- @asymmetric: nit: it’s not the author who’s awaiting for funds, but an implementer
- Will ping shepherd team about what needs to happen for the RFC to move forward
- Remind to merge shepherd team suggestion
- RFC 181: List index syntax
- Updated on 2024-11-16
- Recently moved to “in discussion”, recent activity, leave as is
RFCs in FCP
None
Leader of next meeting
@mat will lead the next meeting on 2024-12-09