Can someone explain how runtimeShell
gets its value? I followed it back to here and here, but it looks to be some fixed-point stuff that I’m still not very comfortable understanding.
Any clarification is appreciated!
Can someone explain how runtimeShell
gets its value? I followed it back to here and here, but it looks to be some fixed-point stuff that I’m still not very comfortable understanding.
Any clarification is appreciated!
$ rg 'runtimeShell ='
pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
12865: runtimeShell = "${runtimeShellPackage}${runtimeShellPackage.shellPath}";
$ rg 'runtimeShellPackage ='
pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
12866: runtimeShellPackage = bash
That was anti-climatic Thanks!
I have never seen this phrase, and a dictionary said it was a synonym to “disappointing”.
What is disappointing here?
Haha, the context is that I was expecting the answer to be a lot more complicated than it turned out to be, thus “anti-climatic.” Nothing wrong with the answer, I appreciate the help
“disappointing” isn’t the best translation…
A story or movie tends to have a series of twists and turns that create a feeling of building tension–and the climax of the narrative often puts the exclamation mark on them.
Something that is anti-climactic isn’t necessarily disappointing in an absolute sense, but it is less exciting or interesting than the build-up led you to expect.
Sort of like going to a fancy restaurant and getting food that, while definitely better than the leftovers you have in the fridge at home, didn’t taste much better than the cheap cafe up the street.
Personally, I would not consider “anti-climactic” to carry a sentiment independent of context, as I understand the word to mean “relating to the opposite of climax” – but it appears that some dictionaries do, see ANTICLIMACTIC | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary and anticlimactic - Wiktionary, the free dictionary.