Merging vmagent into code of victoriametrics as they have the same source base, but a metrics pushing client still dont want to have the full server installed, it keeps the vmagent package.
Should be non breaking and i am using that in my infra since pr creation.
NixOS:master ← Shawn8901:migrate_vmagent
opened 01:12PM - 01 May 24 UTC
## Description of changes
fixes #306253
Main goal is to avoid having 2 de… finitions for building for the same repository (see linked issue).
This PR migrates the building of the client tool vmagent to the victoriametrics package.
This deduplicates the code base on our side as upstream is maintaining and building everything from the same code base (so its a mono repo with different subpackages).
Beside just to split out vmagent, i tried to build up all logical packages that make sense to me, to that people can override the package easily to optimize the derivation size if needed.
One has now
1. the timeseries server
2. vmagent as pushing service
3. alterting tools
4. vmauth as HTTP proxy in case one wants to use authentication for the timeseries server
5. the backup tools to backup the timeseries
6. vmctl which is used to migrate between timeseries (vm to vm, but also from other servers to vm)
7. logging server
A pure minimal server then could just enable the `withServer` and disable everything else.
I personally switched my VM server for testing to just use `withServer` and `withVmAuth` (and `withVmAgent` to be able to push metrics to itself), beside that every other thing is disabled as i am not using it and it seems to run fine.
The said package is ~76MiB large.
The full package victoriametrics is about 162 MiB.
Vmagent by itself is be about 53 MiB (which we are migrating here and is about the same like the old).
I did check the functionality of the reduces package by looking at logs and verifying that my Grafana (with vm-datasource installed) is still able to query the data.
Vmagent is deployed to all my machines, checked the log on those also.
As the vmagent package had different maintainers listed, i migrated everyone to the victoriametrics package.
Please let me know if you disagree with that action @NULLx76 @leona-ya
As the action should be transparent for user of the vmagent package, i dont see a requirement to create a release note here.
In addition, i also added myself as a maintainer.
<!--
For package updates please link to a changelog or describe changes, this helps your fellow maintainers discover breaking updates.
For new packages please briefly describe the package or provide a link to its homepage.
-->
## Things done
- Built on platform(s)
- [x] x86_64-linux
- [x] aarch64-linux
- [ ] x86_64-darwin
- [ ] aarch64-darwin
- For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in `nix.conf`? (See [Nix manual](https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/command-ref/conf-file.html))
- [ ] `sandbox = relaxed`
- [ ] `sandbox = true`
- [ ] Tested, as applicable:
- [NixOS test(s)](https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/index.html#sec-nixos-tests) (look inside [nixos/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/tests))
- and/or [package tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/README.md#package-tests)
- or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in [lib/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/lib/tests) or [pkgs/test](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/test)
- made sure NixOS tests are [linked](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#ssec-nixos-tests-linking) to the relevant packages
- [ ] Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using `nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"`. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see [nixpkgs-review usage](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review#usage)
- [ ] Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in `./result/bin/`)
- [24.05 Release Notes](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2405.section.md) (or backporting [23.05](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2305.section.md) and [23.11](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2311.section.md) Release notes)
- [ ] (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
- [ ] (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
- [ ] (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
- [ ] Fits [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
<!--
To help with the large amounts of pull requests, we would appreciate your
reviews of other pull requests, especially simple package updates. Just leave a
comment describing what you have tested in the relevant package/service.
Reviewing helps to reduce the average time-to-merge for everyone.
Thanks a lot if you do!
List of open PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls
Reviewing guidelines: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/README.md#reviewing-contributions
-->
---
Add a :+1: [reaction] to [pull requests you find important].
[reaction]: https://github.blog/2016-03-10-add-reactions-to-pull-requests-issues-and-comments/
[pull requests you find important]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc
Elysa
May 11, 2024, 6:19pm
3917
NixOS:master ← ElysaSrc:master
opened 03:44PM - 17 Mar 24 UTC
## Description of changes
Adding package `catppuccin-sddm` on nixpkgs, since … we already have some other catppuccin official themes (gtk, plasma, icons etc...).
I've added options to the derivation to control the theme file (flavor, theme.conf options...).
## Things done
- Built on platform(s)
- [X] x86_64-linux
- [ ] aarch64-linux
- [ ] x86_64-darwin
- [ ] aarch64-darwin
- For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in `nix.conf`? (See [Nix manual](https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/command-ref/conf-file.html))
- [ ] `sandbox = relaxed`
- [ ] `sandbox = true`
- [ ] Tested, as applicable:
- [NixOS test(s)](https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/index.html#sec-nixos-tests) (look inside [nixos/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/tests))
- and/or [package tests](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#sec-package-tests)
- or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in [lib/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/lib/tests) or [pkgs/test](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/test)
- made sure NixOS tests are [linked](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#ssec-nixos-tests-linking) to the relevant packages
- [ ] Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using `nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"`. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see [nixpkgs-review usage](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review#usage)
- [X] Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in `./result/bin/`)
- [24.05 Release Notes](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2405.section.md) (or backporting [23.05](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2305.section.md) and [23.11](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2311.section.md) Release notes)
- [ ] (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
- [ ] (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
- [ ] (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
- [X] Fits [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
---
Add a :+1: [reaction] to [pull requests you find important].
[reaction]: https://github.blog/2016-03-10-add-reactions-to-pull-requests-issues-and-comments/
[pull requests you find important]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc
Hello, I already shared this one in the past hope it’s okay to share it again.
Posting again for GNOME 46 users! This PR will allow the default GNOME System Monitor extension to be enabled.
NixOS:master ← Nanotwerp:gnome-system-monitor-extension-fix
opened 03:55PM - 08 May 24 UTC
## Description of changes
This PR patches `gnomeExtensions.system-monitor`, an … extension installed by default as of `GNOME 46`, so that `GTop` is within its path; otherwise, an error occurs when trying to enable this extension.
<!--
For package updates please link to a changelog or describe changes, this helps your fellow maintainers discover breaking updates.
For new packages please briefly describe the package or provide a link to its homepage.
-->
## Things done
- Built on platform(s)
- [x] x86_64-linux
- [ ] aarch64-linux
- [ ] x86_64-darwin
- [ ] aarch64-darwin
- For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in `nix.conf`? (See [Nix manual](https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/command-ref/conf-file.html))
- [ ] `sandbox = relaxed`
- [ ] `sandbox = true`
- [ ] Tested, as applicable:
- [NixOS test(s)](https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/index.html#sec-nixos-tests) (look inside [nixos/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/tests))
- and/or [package tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/README.md#package-tests)
- or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in [lib/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/lib/tests) or [pkgs/test](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/test)
- made sure NixOS tests are [linked](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#ssec-nixos-tests-linking) to the relevant packages
- [ ] Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using `nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"`. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see [nixpkgs-review usage](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review#usage)
- [ ] Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in `./result/bin/`)
- [24.05 Release Notes](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2405.section.md) (or backporting [23.05](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2305.section.md) and [23.11](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2311.section.md) Release notes)
- [ ] (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
- [ ] (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
- [ ] (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
- [ ] Fits [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
<!--
To help with the large amounts of pull requests, we would appreciate your
reviews of other pull requests, especially simple package updates. Just leave a
comment describing what you have tested in the relevant package/service.
Reviewing helps to reduce the average time-to-merge for everyone.
Thanks a lot if you do!
List of open PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls
Reviewing guidelines: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/README.md#reviewing-contributions
-->
---
Add a :+1: [reaction] to [pull requests you find important].
[reaction]: https://github.blog/2016-03-10-add-reactions-to-pull-requests-issues-and-comments/
[pull requests you find important]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc
Cynerd
May 14, 2024, 7:55am
3928
Multiple of my pull requests:
Could anyone please merge at least those NixOS modules? They are fixes for broker modules for which I am marked as a maintainer and I am really not happy with having them broken.
Fixes the x86_64 toolchain not beind embedded on the binary.
NixOS:master ← onemoresuza:hare-fix-makeflags
opened 02:20PM - 14 May 24 UTC
## Description of changes
Remove `CC` since it is not used.
Capitalize x86_64 … (from `x86_64` to `X86_64`) to embed their values on
the binary.
Patch the `hare` command so that it has the `-v` option for the
`version` subcommand. With it, is much easier to check the paths of the
toolchains, since we do not need to rely on:
`strings <path-to-hare-binary> | grep <toolchain-path>`
Result of `nixpkgs-review` run on x86_64-linux [1](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review)
<details>
<summary>1 package marked as broken and skipped:</summary>
<ul>
<li>himitsu-firefox</li>
</ul>
</details>
<details>
<summary>16 packages built:</summary>
<ul>
<li>bonsai</li>
<li>hare</li>
<li>hare.man</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-compress</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-ev</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-json</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-png</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-ssh</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-toml</li>
<li>haredo</li>
<li>haredo.man</li>
<li>haredoc</li>
<li>haredoc.man</li>
<li>himitsu</li>
<li>treecat</li>
<li>treecat.man</li>
</ul>
</details>
<!--
For package updates please link to a changelog or describe changes, this helps your fellow maintainers discover breaking updates.
For new packages please briefly describe the package or provide a link to its homepage.
-->
## Things done
- Built on platform(s)
- [X] x86_64-linux
- [ ] aarch64-linux
- [ ] x86_64-darwin
- [ ] aarch64-darwin
- For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in `nix.conf`? (See [Nix manual](https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/command-ref/conf-file.html))
- [ ] `sandbox = relaxed`
- [ ] `sandbox = true`
- [X] Tested, as applicable:
- [NixOS test(s)](https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/index.html#sec-nixos-tests) (look inside [nixos/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/tests))
- and/or [package tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/README.md#package-tests)
- or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in [lib/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/lib/tests) or [pkgs/test](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/test)
- made sure NixOS tests are [linked](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#ssec-nixos-tests-linking) to the relevant packages
- [X] Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using `nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"`. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see [nixpkgs-review usage](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review#usage)
- [X] Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in `./result/bin/`)
- [24.05 Release Notes](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2405.section.md) (or backporting [23.05](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2305.section.md) and [23.11](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2311.section.md) Release notes)
- [ ] (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
- [ ] (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
- [ ] (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
- [X] Fits [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
<!--
To help with the large amounts of pull requests, we would appreciate your
reviews of other pull requests, especially simple package updates. Just leave a
comment describing what you have tested in the relevant package/service.
Reviewing helps to reduce the average time-to-merge for everyone.
Thanks a lot if you do!
List of open PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls
Reviewing guidelines: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/README.md#reviewing-contributions
-->
---
Add a :+1: [reaction] to [pull requests you find important].
[reaction]: https://github.blog/2016-03-10-add-reactions-to-pull-requests-issues-and-comments/
[pull requests you find important]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc
hraban
May 14, 2024, 3:06pm
3931
Resubmitting this PR: it has already been reviewed and should be ready to go, just needs a merge.
NixOS:master ← afh:update-refactor-dockutil
opened 02:57PM - 03 Mar 24 UTC
Diff: https://github.com/kcrawford/dockutil/compare/3.0.2...3.1.3
## Descript… ion of changes
<!--
For package updates please link to a changelog or describe changes, this helps your fellow maintainers discover breaking updates.
For new packages please briefly describe the package or provide a link to its homepage.
-->
* Update to 3.1.3
* Refactor to build from source on aarch64 instead of extracting pre-built binary from downloaded `.pkg`
❓ Is such a refactoring to build a package from source desirable from this project's point of view or less so?
## Things done
- Built on platform(s)
- [ ] x86_64-linux
- [ ] aarch64-linux
- [x] x86_64-darwin
- [x] aarch64-darwin
- For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in `nix.conf`? (See [Nix manual](https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/command-ref/conf-file.html))
- [ ] `sandbox = relaxed`
- [ ] `sandbox = true`
- [ ] Tested, as applicable:
- [NixOS test(s)](https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/index.html#sec-nixos-tests) (look inside [nixos/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/tests))
- and/or [package tests](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#sec-package-tests)
- or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in [lib/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/lib/tests) or [pkgs/test](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/test)
- made sure NixOS tests are [linked](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#ssec-nixos-tests-linking) to the relevant packages
- [x] Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using `nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"`. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see [nixpkgs-review usage](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review#usage)
- [ ] Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in `./result/bin/`)
- [24.05 Release Notes](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2405.section.md) (or backporting [23.05](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2305.section.md) and [23.11](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2311.section.md) Release notes)
- [ ] (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
- [ ] (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
- [ ] (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
- [ ] Fits [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
<!--
To help with the large amounts of pull requests, we would appreciate your
reviews of other pull requests, especially simple package updates. Just leave a
comment describing what you have tested in the relevant package/service.
Reviewing helps to reduce the average time-to-merge for everyone.
Thanks a lot if you do!
List of open PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls
Reviewing guidelines: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#chap-reviewing-contributions
-->
---
Add a :+1: [reaction] to [pull requests you find important].
[reaction]: https://github.blog/2016-03-10-add-reactions-to-pull-requests-issues-and-comments/
[pull requests you find important]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc
Fix the mime module by using mailcap’s /etc/mime.types.
NixOS:master ← onemoresuza:hare-fix-mime-module
opened 04:20PM - 14 May 24 UTC
## Description of changes
The mime module relies on the `/etc/mime.types` file.… We may hardcode it
like the Golang recipe[0].
Also add a `passthru.tests.mimeModule` so that we can be certain that
the module is working.
[0]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/f1010e0469db743d14519a1efd37e23f8513d714/pkgs/development/compilers/go/1.22.nix#L79
Result of `nixpkgs-review` run on x86_64-linux [1](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review)
<details>
<summary>1 package marked as broken and skipped:</summary>
<ul>
<li>himitsu-firefox</li>
</ul>
</details>
<details>
<summary>16 packages built:</summary>
<ul>
<li>bonsai</li>
<li>hare</li>
<li>hare.man</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-compress</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-ev</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-json</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-png</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-ssh</li>
<li>hareThirdParty.hare-toml</li>
<li>haredo</li>
<li>haredo.man</li>
<li>haredoc</li>
<li>haredoc.man</li>
<li>himitsu</li>
<li>treecat</li>
<li>treecat.man</li>
</ul>
</details>
<!--
For package updates please link to a changelog or describe changes, this helps your fellow maintainers discover breaking updates.
For new packages please briefly describe the package or provide a link to its homepage.
-->
## Things done
- Built on platform(s)
- [X] x86_64-linux
- [ ] aarch64-linux
- [ ] x86_64-darwin
- [ ] aarch64-darwin
- For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in `nix.conf`? (See [Nix manual](https://nixos.org/manual/nix/stable/command-ref/conf-file.html))
- [ ] `sandbox = relaxed`
- [ ] `sandbox = true`
- [X] Tested, as applicable:
- [NixOS test(s)](https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/index.html#sec-nixos-tests) (look inside [nixos/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/tests))
- and/or [package tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/README.md#package-tests)
- or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in [lib/tests](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/lib/tests) or [pkgs/test](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/test)
- made sure NixOS tests are [linked](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#ssec-nixos-tests-linking) to the relevant packages
- [ ] Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using `nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"`. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see [nixpkgs-review usage](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review#usage)
- [X] Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in `./result/bin/`)
- [24.05 Release Notes](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2405.section.md) (or backporting [23.05](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2305.section.md) and [23.11](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2311.section.md) Release notes)
- [ ] (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
- [ ] (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
- [ ] (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
- [X] Fits [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
<!--
To help with the large amounts of pull requests, we would appreciate your
reviews of other pull requests, especially simple package updates. Just leave a
comment describing what you have tested in the relevant package/service.
Reviewing helps to reduce the average time-to-merge for everyone.
Thanks a lot if you do!
List of open PRs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls
Reviewing guidelines: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/README.md#reviewing-contributions
-->
---
Add a :+1: [reaction] to [pull requests you find important].
[reaction]: https://github.blog/2016-03-10-add-reactions-to-pull-requests-issues-and-comments/
[pull requests you find important]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc